> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 08:34:26 -0800 > From: Bryan Vyhmeister <[email protected]> > > Ping. Any thoughts?
ok kettenis@ > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 05:26:12PM -0800, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: > > I noticed that the order of listed Intel integrated graphics support is > > not consistent from newest to oldest as it is for Radeon devices on the > > same page. The patch puts Kaby Lake above Skylake as it is 7th and then > > 6th generation respectively. > > > > Bryan > > > > > > Index: amd64.html > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/www/amd64.html,v > > retrieving revision 1.274 > > diff -u -p -r1.274 amd64.html > > --- amd64.html 19 Nov 2017 18:36:41 -0000 1.274 > > +++ amd64.html 29 Jan 2018 01:22:34 -0000 > > @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ expected to work: > > <p> > > Intel devices can be confusing as well. Some devices expected to work: > > <ul> > > -<li>Intel Skylake (found on i-6xxx CPU) > > <li>Intel Kaby Lake (found on i-7xxx CPU) > > +<li>Intel Skylake (found on i-6xxx CPU) > > <li>Intel Broadwell (found on i-5xxx CPU) > > <li>Earlier Intel models and revisions are expected to work as well. > > <li>The PowerVR graphics found on some Atom CPUs are not supported. > > > >
