Ayaka Koshibe(akosh...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.20 21:20:20 -0800: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Reyk Floeter <r...@openbsd.org> wrote: > > > >> Am 20.02.2018 um 11:15 schrieb Klemens Nanni <k...@openbsd.org>: > >> > >>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 05:09:58PM -0800, Ayaka Koshibe wrote: > >>> This diff would allow saying 'ifconfig foo -rdomain' instead of 'ifconfig > >>> foo rdomain 0'. > >> I can see where you're coming from but this breaks semantics: `-option' > >> clears an optional parameter or deconfigures functionality whereas > >> `rdomain' is mandatory (defaulting to 0), every interface is attached > >> to exactly one routing domain all the time. > >> > > > > I would rather say that -option resets it to the default non-specific > > option. For example, -mode doesn???t remove all wireless modes. > > This was also my interpretation of -option -- a way to reset to the > default, which happens to be a value of 0 for this case. > > > I think -rdomain is a good addition and the diff looks fine. > > > > Reyk
i'm ok with the diff as well, but i want to remind you that rdomain is special, because it also removes all ip configuration from the interface. I.e. -rdomain does more than the other -options.
