On 7 March 2018 at 17:27, Gerhard Roth <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 17:20:06 +0100 Mike Belopuhov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 7 March 2018 at 17:01, Gerhard Roth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Benno, > > > > > > thanks for your reply. > > > > > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:22:28 +0100 Sebastian Benoit <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > switchd and vmd use the same proc.c,and should stay in sync. > > > > > > Ack. I missed them. > > > > > > > iked also uses proc.c. I think you've got all the others, > > but perhaps you should run a find? > > > > Cheers, > > Mike > > Hi Mike, > > but iked still uses an older version of proc.c that just forks off > the children but does not execve() the own binary. > > Also, iked is the only one that daemon(3)-izes before calling > proc_init(). So here stdout, stdin, and stderr is already remapped > to /dev/null before forking the kids. > > Gerhard
I see. Reyk always wanted to keep them all in sync, but I guess it's too late to care about that if they've already diverged.
