On 7 March 2018 at 17:27, Gerhard Roth <gerhard_r...@genua.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 17:20:06 +0100 Mike Belopuhov <m...@belopuhov.com>
wrote:
> > On 7 March 2018 at 17:01, Gerhard Roth <gerhard_r...@genua.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Benno,
> > >
> > > thanks for your reply.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:22:28 +0100 Sebastian Benoit <be...@openbsd.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > switchd and vmd use the same proc.c,and should stay in sync.
> > >
> > > Ack. I missed them.
> > >
> >
> > iked also uses proc.c. I think you've got all the others,
> > but perhaps you should run a find?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mike
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> but iked still uses an older version of proc.c that just forks off
> the children but does not execve() the own binary.
>
> Also, iked is the only one that daemon(3)-izes before calling
> proc_init(). So here stdout, stdin, and stderr is already remapped
> to /dev/null before forking the kids.
>
> Gerhard

I see.  Reyk always wanted to keep them all in sync, but I guess
it's too late to care about that if they've already diverged.

Reply via email to