>On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:11:22AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> I think this approach is wrong, insane, and fragile.  DVF_ACTIVE
>> doesn't work precisely that way.
>
>Yes, it's a hack, but i don't see it as fragile, nor insane,
>and i agree something better is great, but it does work exactly
>as i wanted:

for 1 driver.

Reply via email to