Thanks for your comments!
On 6/9/2018 12:35 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:34 AM Nan Xiao <n...@chinadtrace.org
> <mailto:n...@chinadtrace.org>> wrote:
> I think maybe one snprintf is more efficient and concise. Sorry if I am
> wrong, thanks!
> Seems unlikely. More productive would be to go up a level and look at
> whether concat() is carrying its weight as an abstraction. One of the
> calls is completely superfluous, to my eye.
> But really, ldconfig is pretty uninteresting, being run very, very
> rarely, so polishing it is like sanding the rough spots on the bottoms
> of table legs, where they touch the floor. We've spent more cycles
> talking about it then it'll use in a year...
> Philip Guenther