On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:09:26PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> I don't understand why it's equivalent.
>
> prefixlen() seems to operate on so_mask while the only caller of
> inet6_makenetandmask() passes in so_dst.
>
> Assuming it is equivalent, inet6_makenetandmask() is now missnamed and
> I think we should just get rid of it. We can just call prefixlen()
> directly, the diff turns inet6_makenetandmask() into a weird wrapper
> around prefixlen(). Note that sep can't be NULL, so plen can't be
> NULL.
`sep' is NULL everytime the address string passed on the command line
does not contain "/". so `plen' is NULL and we set the prefixlen as it
wasn't specified in the first place.
