On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 12:01:41PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 01:27:48AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > Updated diff bringing this function in line with its counterparts by
> > using `mask' the same way.
> > 
> > If a mask was specified, `mask' would always equal to `bits' as returned
> > by inet_net_pton(), so avoid the duplicate.
> > 
> > While here, directly use the destination size in memcpy() instead of
> > hardcoding its type.
> I'd  still like to see this in as it makes host_v4() consistent with
> host_v6() with regard to `mask' handling.
> 
    reads OK to me.

sashan

Reply via email to