On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 09:01:41AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > Why u_char instead of int? The errors in that list are used in errno which > is an int. So my usual feeling is to use the type which is naturally used > and don't try to optimize for space.
Basically I want to have it the same for inet and inet6. The numbers fit, FreeBSD uses u_char for both, so why not save some memory? I have already commited it with mpi@'s ok. I don't insist on u_char, you can change it to int if you want. bluhm
