On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:17:05PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Now `t' under the anonymous anchors (internally named "_1") must not be
> modified through pfctl:
>
> # pfctl -a _1 -t t -T flush
> 0 addresses deleted.
Why do you think that this semantic is wrong? Why should tables
within an anonoumus anchor be constant?
> + warnx("anchors apply to -f, -F, -t and -s only");
If I understand English comma rules correctly, there is also a comma
before the " and". At least this is what we do in the man page.
bluhm
