Re: unveil(2) getent(1)

[Klemens Nanni]

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 08:56:14PM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> I actually prefer to see it go away since it doesn't protect us much and the
> real meat is actually on the pledge(2) inside the loop. Nevertheless this 
> still
> should on a separate commit.
OK kn