On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 06:48:07AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote: > One comment inline, otherwise OK millert@
> > @@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ static int
> > services(int argc, char *argv[])
> > {
> > struct servent *se;
> > + const char *err;
> > + char *proto;
> > + int serv;
>
> This should be in_port_t, not int. I would also call the variable
> port instead of serv but the type is what is important.
Missed that one, thanks.
I'll commit it with `in_port_t port' later this evening unless someone
objects.
