On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:35:35PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> 
> 
> I think it's fair to give the user a chance to understand why
> scan_ffs(8) won't help in this case.
> 
> ok?
> 

hi.

i'm not sure if it's a bug, but it sure seems relevant. i would be
tempted to be much more upfront about this (DESCRIPTION), way before you
start tearing hair out...

like just say upfront, scan_ffs does not support ffs2 filesystems.

jmc

> 
> --- scan_ffs.8.~1.16.~        Mon Mar 24 00:28:46 2008
> +++ scan_ffs.8        Fri Feb  8 21:31:10 2019
> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ you out of a jam when they happen.
>  .Sh SEE ALSO
>  .Xr disklabel 8
>  .Sh BUGS
> -It is not perfect, and could do a lot more things with date/time information
> +It is not perfect, does not support FFS2 filesystems,
> +and could do a lot more things with date/time information
>  in the superblocks it finds, but this program has saved more than one butt,
>  more than once.
> 
> -- 
> jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
> 

Reply via email to