>> ... it says the modification time is a time_t. Which means we only >> have seconds, not subseconds. > > Fair enough. The protocol predates common availability of nanosecond > file timestamps.
It's worse than that. It's 32-bit time_t.
>> ... it says the modification time is a time_t. Which means we only >> have seconds, not subseconds. > > Fair enough. The protocol predates common availability of nanosecond > file timestamps.
It's worse than that. It's 32-bit time_t.