On 2019/03/29 15:12, [email protected] wrote:
> [not currently subscribed, please Cc, thanks.]
> 
> Yes, despite the reservation in the comment above the code with the
> tyop, the offending condition is indeed triggered on this
> particularly cheap craptop. Figuring that out is a separate
> matter...

thanks, typo fixed.

>          --zeurkous.
> 
> Index: src/sys/dev/pci/if_jme.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_jme.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.50
> diff -u -p -r1.50 if_jme.c
> --- src/sys/dev/pci/if_jme.c  8 Sep 2017 05:36:52 -0000       1.50
> +++ src/sys/dev/pci/if_jme.c  29 Mar 2019 13:57:36 -0000
> @@ -1738,7 +1738,7 @@ jme_rxeof(struct jme_softc *sc)
>               pktlen = JME_RX_BYTES(letoh32(desc->buflen));
>               if (nsegs != howmany(pktlen, MCLBYTES)) {
>                       printf("%s: RX fragment count(%d) "
> -                         "and packet size(%d) mismach\n",
> +                         "and packet size(%d) mismatch\n",
>                            sc->sc_dev.dv_xname, nsegs, pktlen);
>                       break;
>               }
> 
> -- 
> Friggin' Machines!
> 

Reply via email to