Ted Unangst <[email protected]> wrote: > ca_exec or ca_system I could go either way, but there's no longer sh involved, > so that's why I went back to exec.
Even more accurate to name it ca_execv(), since this is a argv[] interface.
Ted Unangst <[email protected]> wrote: > ca_exec or ca_system I could go either way, but there's no longer sh involved, > so that's why I went back to exec.
Even more accurate to name it ca_execv(), since this is a argv[] interface.