On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 07:03:34PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote: > When using "route -n", also print numeric value for default route.
I use -n to avoid DNS lookups. "default" does not do that. So I do not see the benefit of this change. It has been that way for ever without harm. New behavior would be different. It breaks peoples expectations and possibly some scripts. What is wrong with "default"? Why is "0.0.0.0/0" and "::/0" better? bluhm
