> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 12:02:22 -0300
> From: Martin Pieuchot <[email protected]>
>
> Sleeping at PUSER when coming from a sysctl context is purely arbitrary.
> I'd like to reduce the number of PUSER usages to help people understand
> the current scheduler logic.
>
> Ok?
ok kettenis@
> Index: arch/i386/i386/esm.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/i386/esm.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.59
> diff -u -p -r1.59 esm.c
> --- arch/i386/i386/esm.c 8 Sep 2015 07:12:56 -0000 1.59
> +++ arch/i386/i386/esm.c 1 Jun 2019 16:05:18 -0000
> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ esm_watchdog(void *arg, int period)
> * should have a process context we can sleep in.
> */
> while (sc->sc_step != 0) {
> - if (tsleep(sc, PUSER | PCATCH, "esm", 0) == EINTR) {
> + if (tsleep(sc, PWAIT | PCATCH, "esm", 0) == EINTR) {
> splx(s);
> return (sc->sc_wdog_period);
> }
>
>
