Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 04:15:10PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 11:44:10AM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > In that case would it makes sense to apply the so-called unicast > > check to `ifp', the incoming interface, first? > > Right. Had rewritten the patch to do this explicitely: +1 goto, > -1 (I hope) confusion point about ifp setting. > > The bridge with updated patch works as expected already for some hours > in production: will continue to monitor it.
No issues up to date. Ping! Pong? -- rea
