> I'm wondering if we should make this the default. I'm seeing no breakage > as a result of using it, and it fixes things with some annoying network > configurations.
The option does add overhead though because it will fragment messages even if the MTU is big enough. As a result it will add some latecy to the key exchange. On the other hand, usually only messages containing certificates are big enough to trigger fragmentation, so the impact is probably quite low. >From a compatibility point of view, fragmentation should only fix things and not break anything. I'm ok with this as the default config should be one that "just works" for all network configurations. Those that want better latency can still turn it off.
