Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > On 2019/11/01 23:32, Solene Rapenne wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:06:48PM -0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > On 2019-10-31, Solene Rapenne <sol...@perso.pw> wrote: > > > > > > > I suggest adding a priority=5 to _pbuild user. > > > > > > Is this the right place? Or should dpb do this? > > > > > > -- > > > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de > > > > > > > using the _pbuild class it applies for package building using make and > > also when using dpb (which uses make). I don't understand why it should > > be handled by dpb. > > > > Building ports isn't the only thing that places demands on the system > that can result in slow interactive behaviour. If working around this > via priority in login.conf is considered acceptable (I don't like it > much myself..) would it be better to make the default class lower- > priority and set e.g. staff to something higher?
What about all the other users who aren't in staff? I think the approach is right. Push non-interactive down.
