Vadim Zhukov <persg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> But anyway, root-only requirement for listing available syspatches
> seems a bit silly.

as Antoine has replied, this is so the file retrieval occurs as a
privsep user, so that a bug in that tooling is very much more difficult
to exploit.  Undoing that privsep feels unhealthy.

The simplest form of check doesn't even need this much work:  If a
newer SHA256.sig file has been published, maybe there's something new.

Reply via email to