On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:14:17PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> drop the _PCIE and just have
> 
> product SYMBIOS SSS6200
Sure enough.  I added it in analogy to other devices.  What is the rule
here for such suffix?  Only when the same product/chip is available
as PCI *and* PCIE model or so?


Index: mpii.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/mpii.c,v
retrieving revision 1.121
diff -u -p -r1.121 mpii.c
--- mpii.c      12 Sep 2019 22:22:53 -0000      1.121
+++ mpii.c      28 Dec 2019 02:21:03 -0000
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ mpii_dvatosge(struct mpii_sge *sge, u_in
 static const struct pci_matchid mpii_devices[] = {
        { PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS,   PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SAS2004 },
        { PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS,   PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SAS2008 },
+       { PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS,   PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SSS6200 },
        { PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS,   PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SAS2108_3 },
        { PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS,   PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SAS2108_4 },
        { PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS,   PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SAS2108_5 },
Index: pcidevs
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
retrieving revision 1.1902
diff -u -p -r1.1902 pcidevs
--- pcidevs     20 Nov 2019 16:33:00 -0000      1.1902
+++ pcidevs     28 Dec 2019 02:20:53 -0000
@@ -6195,6 +6195,7 @@ product SYMBIOS SAS2108_5 0x0077  SAS2108
 product SYMBIOS SAS2108_1      0x0078  MegaRAID SAS2108 CRYPTO GEN2
 product SYMBIOS SAS2108_2      0x0079  MegaRAID SAS2108 GEN2
 product SYMBIOS SAS1078DE      0x007c  SAS1078DE
+product SYMBIOS SSS6200                0x007e  SSS6200
 product SYMBIOS SAS2208_1      0x0080  SAS2208
 product SYMBIOS SAS2208_2      0x0081  SAS2208
 product SYMBIOS SAS2208_3      0x0082  SAS2208

Reply via email to