On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:14:17PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> drop the _PCIE and just have
>
> product SYMBIOS SSS6200
Sure enough. I added it in analogy to other devices. What is the rule
here for such suffix? Only when the same product/chip is available
as PCI *and* PCIE model or so?
Index: mpii.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/mpii.c,v
retrieving revision 1.121
diff -u -p -r1.121 mpii.c
--- mpii.c 12 Sep 2019 22:22:53 -0000 1.121
+++ mpii.c 28 Dec 2019 02:21:03 -0000
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ mpii_dvatosge(struct mpii_sge *sge, u_in
static const struct pci_matchid mpii_devices[] = {
{ PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS, PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SAS2004 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS, PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SAS2008 },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS, PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SSS6200 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS, PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SAS2108_3 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS, PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SAS2108_4 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS, PCI_PRODUCT_SYMBIOS_SAS2108_5 },
Index: pcidevs
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
retrieving revision 1.1902
diff -u -p -r1.1902 pcidevs
--- pcidevs 20 Nov 2019 16:33:00 -0000 1.1902
+++ pcidevs 28 Dec 2019 02:20:53 -0000
@@ -6195,6 +6195,7 @@ product SYMBIOS SAS2108_5 0x0077 SAS2108
product SYMBIOS SAS2108_1 0x0078 MegaRAID SAS2108 CRYPTO GEN2
product SYMBIOS SAS2108_2 0x0079 MegaRAID SAS2108 GEN2
product SYMBIOS SAS1078DE 0x007c SAS1078DE
+product SYMBIOS SSS6200 0x007e SSS6200
product SYMBIOS SAS2208_1 0x0080 SAS2208
product SYMBIOS SAS2208_2 0x0081 SAS2208
product SYMBIOS SAS2208_3 0x0082 SAS2208
