On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 09:11:01PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The way I see it, "ldomctl console" is just there for compatibility > with vmctl. We don't really need it for sparc64 as the random > allocation of ttys that vmm(4) suffers from doesn't happen (and there > are interesting user permission issues that we discussed a few weeks > ago). I added it to be able to address guests by their names which I know instead of their serial devices which I have to derive from the overall config.
Compatibility with vmctl is certainly nice but of less importance. > I continue to use "cu -l ttyV2" as I'm used to it (and it takes less > typing). But occasionally I need to refresh my memory about the tty > assigned to my domains. Fair enough, if that's still helpful in your use case I'll just leave it there.
