On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 05:41:15PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 05:07:42PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > As already done on iwm(4) and one of the athn(4), there is no need to pass > > the radio tap structure to bpf_mtap by faking up an mbuf. The code can > > just use bpf_mtap_hdr() (which does a similar dance but with far less > > memory on the stack). > > > > There are many other wifi driver that do the same thing so I would be > > happy if somebody else would apply the same logic there too :) > > > > I could only compile test this diff. > > OK for the ar9003.c part right away. There is no way to otherwise test > it cause this code does not work with real hardware yet. > > I'll check if I can easily test the others.
As expected the diff works fine on ath(4) and on two ral(4) variants I could test: rt2560 and rt2661. These changes are very mechanical so we can assume that rt2860 will also work. ok stsp@
