On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:25:56 +1000, David Gwynne wrote: > how about this? this has the cursor handling move the traversal and > NULL check back to the for loop instead of looping on its own.
Much better. OK millert@ - todd
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:25:56 +1000, David Gwynne wrote: > how about this? this has the cursor handling move the traversal and > NULL check back to the for loop instead of looping on its own.
Much better. OK millert@ - todd