On 24/05/20(Sun) 22:58, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > > Please yes, remove the duplication before trying to address concurrency > > issues. It will make review easier :) > > We stopped at `pppx_ifs_lk’ removal, so let’s continue but after [1] > finished. > > 1. https://marc.info/?t=158998611500002&r=1&w=2
Please, re-send the diff that need to be committed.