On 24/05/20(Sun) 22:58, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > Please yes, remove the duplication before trying to address concurrency
> > issues.  It will make review easier :)
> 
> We stopped at `pppx_ifs_lk’ removal, so let’s continue but after [1]
> finished.
> 
> 1. https://marc.info/?t=158998611500002&r=1&w=2

Please, re-send the diff that need to be committed.

Reply via email to