On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:12 AM Vitaliy Makkoveev <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 27 May 2020, at 01:29, Sergey Ryazanov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On 25 May 2020, at 22:04, Sergey Ryazanov <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 3:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> For example, each pipex session should have unique pair of `protocol’ and > >>>> `session_id’. These values are passed from userland. While the only > >>>> instance of npppd(8) uses pipex(4) this is not the problem. But you > >>>> introduce the case while pipex(4) will be used by multiple independent > >>>> userland programs. At least, I have interest how you handle this. > >>> > >>> This should not be a problem here. npppd(8) support server mode only. > >>> While my work is to implement acceleration for client side of L2TP > >>> connection. > >> > >> I guess they can coexist. Also you can have multiple connections to > >> ppp servers simultaneously. > > > > With 16 bits long session id field, according to birthday problem to > > reach 0.9 collision probability I need 549 simultaneous sessions. > > Should I still be worried or I have a time to complete integration > > work and then update UDP filter for love of the game? > > Why do you ask me? Do what you want.
I want to prioritize my todo list, and I in need of advice, is possible collision is non-critical at the moment, or I missed something and should solve it first? -- Serge
