On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27 2020, Jesper Wallin <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...] > > > I still think the RES_USE_AD option might be a useful though, for when > > you want to decide on an application-level whether to trust AD or not? > > RES_TRUSTAD can also be used for this, but as the proposed documentation > points out it would be better to let the admin decide. One > (dis)advantage of using that name is that some external applications > already grok it (eg ports/mail/postfix). >
Oh, of course! My bad. *facepalm* I decided to use RES_USE_AD since the last 4 options in res_init(3) was using that naming convension. Also, it would be silly to "use ad" without actually trusting it? :-)
