On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:03:54PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:18:48PM -0700, Evan Silberman wrote: > > Not to provoke a deep philosophical debate about the difference between > > Ql, Cm, and Sy, but surely Em isn't the best choice here. A couple other > > nits that bothered me in the same general region, I guess your taste > > might vary. > > > > Evan Silberman > > > > hi > > > ----------------------------------------------- > > commit 233b62ce4e6cd3388e68f407e50758111b3eeffc (ifconfig.8) > > from: Evan Silberman <e...@jklol.net> > > date: Sat Aug 22 21:14:25 2020 UTC > > > > Improve markup and punctuation concerning groups > > > > - They're groups, not scare-quotes-"groups" > > oddly enough, this usage is probably close to what Em is meant for ;) > quoting here is just another way to add that emphasis. but i agree it > doesn;t make the text more readable. > > > - The markup for the default groups is debatable, but Cm seems closest. > > You might also like: Ql, Sy > > i would prefer to use one macro rather than two. i agree Em is not > great. i would just use Dq. > > > - Parenthesized plural(s) is (are) distracting > > > > i heartily agree. > > so, if no one chips in soon, i will commit your diff, but with a > straight Em->Dq replacement. > > jmc >
...which i have just done. thanks for the diff, jmc
