On 22/09/20(Tue) 10:20, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:15:00 +0200 > > From: Martin Pieuchot <[email protected]> > > > > Spell inline correctly, also reduce the diff with NetBSD for uvm_amap.c > > and uvm_fault.c. > > > > ok? > > In general, yes. This might interfere with the diff that guenther@ > did a while ago to lock amaps and unlock more of uvm. Now that the > uvm_map_inentry() mystery is (largely) solved, it may be worth looking > into that diff again. Or is that what you're doing right now?
That's what I am doing right now without the knowledge of guenther@'s prior work, could you share it?
