On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 02:09:57PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/11/27 13:41, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > +++ wg.4  27 Nov 2020 12:28:32 -0000
> > > @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ interface may be configured to recognise
> > >  .It Key
> > >  Each peer uses its private key and corresponding public key to
> > >  identify itself to others.
> > > +The public key may be displayed by running
> > > +.Xr ifconfig 8
> > > +as root after configuring the private key.
> > >  A peer configures a
> > >  .Nm wg
> > >  interface with its own private key and with the public keys of its peers.
> > 
> > i'm not sure about this text. wouldn;t the "Keys" section make more
> > sense? the "Keys" section itself says:
> > 
> >      When an interface has a private key set with wgkey, the
> >      corresponding public key is shown in the status output of
> >      the interface, like so:
> > 
> >            wgpubkey NW5l2q2MArV5ZXpVXSZwBOyqhohOf8ImDgUB+jPtJps=
> > 
> > maybe we should just elaborate here?
> 
> Ah yes, that does seem a better place, maybe this helps, though
> perhaps the addition to the example script is enough to give the
> hint anyway.
> 
> Index: man4/wg.4
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/wg.4,v
> retrieving revision 1.7
> diff -u -p -r1.7 wg.4
> --- man4/wg.4 27 Nov 2020 14:04:49 -0000      1.7
> +++ man4/wg.4 27 Nov 2020 14:08:56 -0000
> @@ -124,7 +124,10 @@ will accept any random 32-byte base64 st
>  When an interface has a private key set with
>  .Nm wgkey ,
>  the corresponding
> -public key is shown in the status output of the interface, like so:
> +public key is shown in the status output of the interface
> +displayed by
> +.Xr ifconfig 8
> +when run as root, like so:
>  .Bd -literal -offset indent
>  wgpubkey NW5l2q2MArV5ZXpVXSZwBOyqhohOf8ImDgUB+jPtJps=
>  .Ed
> 
> 

fine by me. i tried to think if we had any precedent in the man pages
for this, where output is exposed by root, but couldn't. i thought our
wireless interfaces did sth like that.

i also tried to shorten your text but couldn;t come up with anything
better.

so ok.
jmc

Reply via email to