Re: rw_lock_held() & friends

[Alexandr Nedvedicky]

Hello,

What's the plan for rw_write_held()? Currently macro is true, if whoever holds
the lock.

>  
> +#define      rw_write_held(rwl)      (rw_status(rwl) == RW_WRITE)

    I would expect something like instead:
        
        #define rw_write_held(rwl)      (RWLOCK_OWNER(rwl) == curproc)

    the macro above is true if the current process holds the lock.
    I just want to make sure if it is really your intention.


thanks and
regards
sashan