On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:03:57PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > So ghostbuster records (rfc6493) are showing up in RPKI datasets and > instead of silently ignoring them rpki-client should first of all validate > the file hash in the manifest and later on also validate the CMS data. > > This first diff does ensure that all files in an mft are present and have > a valid hash (no matter if rpki-client is able to handle them or not). > While enquing the work for the parser issue a warning for files that are > currently not known (anything else than .crl, .cer and .roa). > > Seems to work for me :)
OK job@
