Hi,

This issue is present in upstream [0], please take it with them.

[0] 
https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/torvalds/linux@30bb5572ce7a8710fa9ea720b6ecb382791c9800/-/blob/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c#L131

On 13:21 Tue 05 Jan     , Stefan Hagen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I can totally relate to this one.
> 
> Found after a conversation about muscle memory and grepping the source
> tree for ":wq".
> 
> Best Regards,
> Stefan
> 
> Index: ./sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.5
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.5 amdgpu_vcn.c
> --- ./sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c 8 Jun 2020 04:47:59 -0000       
> 1.5
> +++ ./sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c 5 Jan 2021 12:13:51 -0000
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int amdgpu_vcn_sw_init(struct amdgpu_dev
>  
>       /* Bit 20-23, it is encode major and non-zero for new naming convention.
>        * This field is part of version minor and DRM_DISABLED_FLAG in old 
> naming
> -      * convention. Since the l:wq!atest version minor is 0x5B and 
> DRM_DISABLED_FLAG
> +      * convention. Since the latest version minor is 0x5B and 
> DRM_DISABLED_FLAG
>        * is zero in old naming convention, this field is always zero so far.
>        * These four bits are used to tell which naming convention is present.
>        */
> 

Reply via email to