Re: tpm(4): don't use tvtohz(9)

[Klemens Nanni]

On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:16:13PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> As mentioned in a prior mail, tpm(4) is the last user of tvtohz(9) in
> the tree.
> 
> However, we don't need to use tvtohz(9) in tpm(4) at all.  Converting
> from milliseconds to ticks is trivial.  Using an intermediary timeval
> is just pointless indirection.
> 
> With this committed I will be able to remove both tvtohz(9) and
> tstohz(9) from the tree in a subsequent patch.
OK kn