On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 10:34:02PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > The report on bugs shows vmt(4) lagging behind and I sent a working > working open-vm-tools port to ports@ yesterday. > > In case the port gets imported and there are no further regressions wrt. > the functionality vmt(4) already provides, here's a tentative diff to > remove the driver entirely. > > Not asking for OKs at this point because the port neede testing test and > I have only tested with it anyway, but vmt(4) supports i386 as well. > > Thoughts?
The reason I work on vmt(4) is so I don't have to run open-vm-tools, so I don't want to see it removed in favour of open-vm-tools.
