On 29 Mar 19:27, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This patch attempts to add support for receiving A-MSDUs to iwm(4).
> If you are using iwm(4) then please run with this patch and let me
> know if it causes regressions. Thanks!
> 
> ACHTUNG: This patch breaks iwx(4)! Don't use it there! For this reason,
> the patch can neither be committed nor be put into snapshots!!!
> 
> Our net80211 stack de-aggregates A-MSDUs in software. This works fine with
> iwm 7k and 8k devices. However, iwm 9k devices de-aggregate A-MSDUs in
> hardware and net80211 is currently unable to handle this.
> 
> Our current iwm 9k code only works because long ago I disabled reception
> of A-MSDUs for all devices. Unfortunately, the only way to get A-MSDUs
> working on 9k hardware is to add a bunch of driver-specific code which
> handles de-aggregation. Otherwise, net80211 will drop frames which appear
> to arrive out of order, or appear as duplicates even though they were
> simply part of the same A-MSDU and thus share a sequence number.
> The driver can re-order frames correctly based on information provided
> by firmware. I'd rather implement this than letting these devices miss
> out on A-MSDUs because the Rx speed advantage can be significant, around
> 80/90 Mbps (but this will very much depend on the AP).
> 
> If these A-* acronyms don't make sense and you'd like to know more, here
> is a fairly good explanation: https://mrncciew.com/2013/04/11/a-mpdu-a-msdu/
> Note that we care about the nested case, which is also mentioned in this
> article but not explained in detail. It's simply an A-MSDU stashed inside
> an A-MPDU. If an AP can do 11AC, then it should support this.
> 
> iwx(4) hardware has the same problem.
> If this patch works fine on iwm(4) then I can port the changes to iwx(4),
> do another round of testing, and eventually commit to both drivers at
> the same time.
> 
> Some of the changes below are based on code from the Linux iwlwifi driver.
> I am not entirely happy with some of its style. But the code should be in
> good enough shape to be tested.
> 

Hi Stefan,

I tested the patch with my:

iwm0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265" rev 0x78, msi
iwm0: hw rev 0x230, fw ver 34.0.1, address xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx

against my Technicolor MediaAccess TG789vac.

5GHz:

Down:
Conn:   1 Mbps:      105.479 Peak Mbps:      107.955 Avg Mbps: 105.479 25076
13282504      106.366  100.00%                          

Up:
Conn:   1 Mbps:       28.056 Peak Mbps:       28.096 Avg Mbps: 28.056 17004
3483888       27.899  100.00%                          

2GHz:

Down:
Conn:   1 Mbps:       87.640 Peak Mbps:       87.965 Avg Mbps: 87.640 14041
11096024       88.680  100.00%                          

UP:
Conn:   1 Mbps:       22.786 Peak Mbps:       22.844 Avg Mbps: 22.786 9003
3176912       25.441  100.00% 

Thanks for your hard work!

-- 
wq: ~uw

Reply via email to