On 2021/04/26 17:13, Sebastien Marie wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:35:11PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > as proposed by bluhm@ recently, this is the diff to enable dt(4) in > > GENERIC. The overhead should be small, and I have been using it on > > arm64 to successfully debug issues for a while now. > > I would be fine with dt(4) enabled too. > > > I can't vouch that it builds for all architectures... Did anyone do > > that? Number 1 rule: don't break Theo's build. > > One test would be to build on i386 (with full release process): we are > near the limit currently, so it could overflow the available disk > space very easily.
Disk space only really matters for ramdisk kernels, doesn't it? > Regarding usefulness on archs, dt(4) has proper frames-skip support > for amd64, prowerpc64 and sparc64 only (others archs would default to > "don't skip frames in stack traces"). > > Thanks. > -- > Sebastien Marie >
