On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:02:20 -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > If we're going to just return an arbitrary value shouldn't we keep > returning UINT_MAX as we always have? This would preserve compat with > the other BSD libc implementations, too.
I think that a return value of 0 is less likely to cause actual harm but if you'd prefer to use UINT_MAX that is OK with me. > I'd still like to remove the superfluous pointer (itp), but otherwise > there's nothing else we can improve here. Sure, there's no need for itp. - todd
