Scott Cheloha <scottchel...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 01:35:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > This is a lot of fuss. > > > > How many bugs have you found relating to this issue? > > > > Let me guess: zero? > > Right, that's why I'm asking if we need to make a portability > recommendation at all. > > We could also say something like: > > The standard permits sleep() implementations based on > alarm(3). This implementation does not use alarm(3). > > ... or we could say nothing about SIGALRM. I don't know.
Have you found any impacted implimentations? No. Why bother documenting a gotcha which noone has ever made?
