On 29/08/21 08:10 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> wrote: > > > One - admittedly completely unUNIXy - way would be to invent a long, > > descriptive name like /etc/kernel.config.commands or even /bsd.config.cmd > > in the root rather than the /etc directory, which is more discoverable > > because it is right next to the kernel itself. The UNIXy way > > is not necessarily better: Ken would have invented a very short, > > pronouncable name that is not an English word but similar to one, > > like /etc/sycoc (for SYstem COnfiguration Commands). > > I have no idea why you talk about Ken, how obscure > > back in those days it wasn't called /kernel, either. > > the pathname "kernel.something" which is supposed to be somewhat > related to a non-existant pathname "kernel", is what I object to. > > perhaps /etc/bsd.re-config > > but certainly the sub-phrase "kernel" is not discoverable. >
/etc/reorder_kernel.conf
