Because you might not wish to deal with people like me posting dmesg's of absurdly deficient hardware on the lists. Putting minimum values up means you can cast off everything you don't want to bother trying to support as 'not worth your time', without anyone else having to discover that it wasn't worth their time either.
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, at 21:25, Theo de Raadt wrote: > We don't list memory sizing for other architectures. Why list it for i386? > > Why not delete the text? > > Because someone wants the truth? You can't handle ....
