On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 08:10:35PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below turns i386's pmap_collect() into a noop like it is on
> amd64/arm64/powerpc64...  This is part of the UVM unlocking diff and
> might no longer be necessary now that pmap_extract() has been fixed.
> 
> So I'd like to know if we want to align i386's behavior with other
> archs, which should help us debug MI issues or if I drop this diff.
> 
> Since sthen@ tested it, I'd be in favor of putting it in.  ok?

It survived a full i386 regress run.

bluhm

> Index: arch/i386/i386/pmap.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/i386/pmap.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.217
> diff -u -p -r1.217 pmap.c
> --- arch/i386/i386/pmap.c     11 Sep 2021 18:08:32 -0000      1.217
> +++ arch/i386/i386/pmap.c     1 Oct 2021 17:04:20 -0000
> @@ -2259,13 +2259,6 @@ pmap_unwire_86(struct pmap *pmap, vaddr_
>  void
>  pmap_collect(struct pmap *pmap)
>  {
> -     /*
> -      * free all of the pt pages by removing the physical mappings
> -      * for its entire address space.
> -      */
> -
> -     pmap_do_remove(pmap, VM_MIN_ADDRESS, VM_MAX_ADDRESS,
> -         PMAP_REMOVE_SKIPWIRED);
>  }
>  
>  /*

Reply via email to