On 22.10.2021. 16:53, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 04:45:09PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: >> On 22.10.2021. 16:09, Florian Obser wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 22 October 2021 13:55:20 CEST, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> >>> wrote: >>>> On 2021/10/22 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote: >>>>> this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of >>>>> ixl(4) interfaces. >>>> >>>> Would be good to have this tested with NFS if anyone has a way to do so. >>>> nics are probably better now but I'm pretty sure we have had problems >>>> with NFS and offloading in the past. >>> >>> ospf as well. >>> >> >> ospf seems to work >> >> >> smc24# ospfctl show nei >> ID Pri State DeadTime Address Iface Uptime >> 10.1.1.1 1 FULL/BCKUP 00:00:30 192.168.15.123 ixl0 00:01:20 >> >> >> >> 10.11.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 10.12.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 10.13.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 10.14.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 10.15.0.0/16 192.168.15.11 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 10.16.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 10.17.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 10.18.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> >> 192.168.11.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 192.168.12.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 192.168.13.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 192.168.14.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 192.168.16.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 192.168.17.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> 192.168.18.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 >> 00:00:13 >> > > For ospfd tests you want to make sure that some of the ospf packets need > fragmenting. So this needs a sizeable network to hit this. >
Thank you .. i didn't know that ..
