On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 08:41:58 -0700, "Theo de Raadt" wrote: > Great that it is fixed now for us, however this remains a big problem on > older systems. So the question is should we mention this as a coding > hazard for developers, or should we ignore the problem.
This is an implementation detail that may or may not affect other systems. I think it is fine to remove it. - todd
