I'm not a huge fan of these long if else if chains in this code base, so
fine by me. OK
On 2021-11-22 00:18 +01, Theo Buehler <t...@theobuehler.org> wrote:
> bio->num_write aka BIO_number_written(bio). Straightforward. The main
> reason I'm asking is that keeping the two else results in overlong lines
> and awkward line wrapping. So I decided to drop them hoping that's
> acceptable. Otherwise please tell me the preferred way to wrap the
> lines in this part of the tree.
>
> Index: revokeproc.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/acme-client/revokeproc.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.18
> diff -u -p -r1.18 revokeproc.c
> --- revokeproc.c 13 Oct 2021 18:09:42 -0000 1.18
> +++ revokeproc.c 21 Nov 2021 23:07:37 -0000
> @@ -186,15 +186,17 @@ revokeproc(int fd, const char *certfile,
> if (bio == NULL) {
> warnx("BIO_new");
> goto out;
> - } else if (!X509V3_EXT_print(bio, ex, 0, 0)) {
> + }
> + if (!X509V3_EXT_print(bio, ex, 0, 0)) {
> warnx("X509V3_EXT_print");
> goto out;
> - } else if ((san = calloc(1, bio->num_write + 1)) == NULL) {
> + }
> + if ((san = calloc(1, BIO_number_written(bio) + 1)) == NULL) {
> warn("calloc");
> goto out;
> }
> - ssz = BIO_read(bio, san, bio->num_write);
> - if (ssz < 0 || (unsigned)ssz != bio->num_write) {
> + ssz = BIO_read(bio, san, BIO_number_written(bio));
> + if (ssz < 0 || (unsigned)ssz != BIO_number_written(bio)) {
> warnx("BIO_read");
> goto out;
> }
>
--
I'm not entirely sure you are real.
