On 2021/12/28 18:46, Raf Czlonka wrote: > I was also thinking of normalising 'snk' as it is described as: > > "Digital Pathways SecureNet Key authentication" > > in login.conf(5), but: > > "SNK-004 authentication" > > in all of its manual pages - login_snk(8), snkadm(8), and snkinit(8). > > Also, the other token authentication styles in login.conf(5) file > mention (ANSI) X9.9 and the 'snk' line does not. Either way, I wasn't > sure which way around to go.
Digital Pathways SecureNet produces much better search results than SNK-004 for someone trying to figure out whether this is any use. Though adding X9.9 would also make it more obvious that it can be ignored ;)
