> As the kernel currently contains (at least) 1946 pointers leak by using > printf(9) and %p, it might be more efficient to scramble %p with a > static value (randomly assigned at boot time).
Oh come on. That proposal has no security property! Over time we need to delete all such printf's, and log them in a more private fashion. But the proposal you just made goes in the opposite direction, expanding the potential for exposure, by providing easier interfaces which will encourage use.
