On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 09:33:40PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 09:59:10AM +0000, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 02:38:05PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > dwc2, drm and microcode purposefully excluded > > > > > > > morning. > > > > no need for breakfast after reading this one! > > > > the spelling checks out. i have a few tweaks though: > > > > acpireg.h: > > rsdp_signaturee is a change to the actual #define. not sure if that > > changes anything. > > there are no other references to that define >
that's fine, just wanted to check > > > > if_wi_ieee.h: > > "weirdity" should probably just be "oddity", but whatever > > > > wdcvar.h: > > channels-specific data -> channel-specific data > > > > pcppi.c: > > normally it's be to quick -> normally it's too quick > > tb@ suggested this as well > > > > > if_iwmreg.h: > > allows Tx with narrower BW then requested -> ... than requested > > > > pciide.c: > > timings setups -> timing setups > > > > cgtwelve.c/tvtwo.c/zx.c: > > advertize -> advertise: although i dislike the "z" spelling myself, > > it is not incorrect. generally -ise -> -ize seems to be preferred in US > > english. > > I think this is an exception? > you're right. i checked my dictionaries. i get so used to the -ise->-ize change that i expect it everywhere. > > > > zx.c: > > a 8-bit plane -> an 8-bit plane > > > > if_atu.c: > > "requeres" line has a double full stop, > > as does if_atureg.h "psuedo" line > > The .. in this file seems to be for indicating a range of values > ok then > thanks, adding the below, pcppi part already included > so all ok as far as i can see. jmc
