On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:36:31PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2022.01.26 11:54:41 +0100:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:43:25AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:06:37AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > > This diff removes the valid/ subdir in favor of a more direct directory
> > > > layout for all valid CA repository files.
> > > > It moves rrdp and rsync to .rsync and .rrdp but keeps ta/ because trust
> > > > anchors are special.
> > > > 
> > > > The biggest change is probably in the FTS code to cleanup the repo since
> > > > the traversing now starts at ".". Apart from that removing valid results
> > > > in some simplified code (esp. in -f mode).
> > > > 
> > > > This diff is mostly from job@, I just did fixed the FTS bits so the
> > > > cleanup works again.
> > > 
> > > If I do a full run with this diff, I run into
> > > 
> > > rpki-client: both possibilities of file present
> > > 
> > > Instrumenting this error (should it include fn?) it turns out to be
> > 
> > Yes, it should show at least one fn.
> > 
> > > pki-repo.registro.br/repo/A2x6icaKpVWP5uUBzJQzRvEpjvS7PV2qt1Ct/1/3230302e3138392e34302e302f32332d3234203d3e20313roa
> > > 
> > > I have not yet figured out why.
> > 
> > Grrrrr. I once hit this but thought it was something that was wrong with
> > some of my other diffs I have around. Need to look into this. It it for
> > sure something that should not happen.
> 
> interestingly, i did not get that.

I can no longer reproduce either. Maybe I had something in my tree...

> diff reads ok to me otherwise.

Same here. I can't spot a mistake.

Reply via email to