On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:36:31PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2022.01.26 11:54:41 +0100: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:43:25AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:06:37AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > > > This diff removes the valid/ subdir in favor of a more direct directory > > > > layout for all valid CA repository files. > > > > It moves rrdp and rsync to .rsync and .rrdp but keeps ta/ because trust > > > > anchors are special. > > > > > > > > The biggest change is probably in the FTS code to cleanup the repo since > > > > the traversing now starts at ".". Apart from that removing valid results > > > > in some simplified code (esp. in -f mode). > > > > > > > > This diff is mostly from job@, I just did fixed the FTS bits so the > > > > cleanup works again. > > > > > > If I do a full run with this diff, I run into > > > > > > rpki-client: both possibilities of file present > > > > > > Instrumenting this error (should it include fn?) it turns out to be > > > > Yes, it should show at least one fn. > > > > > pki-repo.registro.br/repo/A2x6icaKpVWP5uUBzJQzRvEpjvS7PV2qt1Ct/1/3230302e3138392e34302e302f32332d3234203d3e20313roa > > > > > > I have not yet figured out why. > > > > Grrrrr. I once hit this but thought it was something that was wrong with > > some of my other diffs I have around. Need to look into this. It it for > > sure something that should not happen. > > interestingly, i did not get that.
I can no longer reproduce either. Maybe I had something in my tree... > diff reads ok to me otherwise. Same here. I can't spot a mistake.
